SZDCR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 350

SZDCR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 350

The application was dismissed as the applicants failed to appear, had previous opportunities to litigate the issues, and the grounds sought to be raised were subsumed by the Tribunal’s merits review and were an abuse of process.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time / Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for extension of time dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'abuse of Process' 'merits Review' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time / Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether application for leave to appeal should be granted in light of previous procedural history and abuse of process findings' "Whether procedural complaints about original delegate's decision can be raised after merits review by Refugee Review Tribunal"]

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed as the applicants failed to appear, had previous opportunities to litigate the issues, and the grounds sought to be raised were subsumed by the Tribunal’s merits review and were an abuse of process.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for extension of time be dismissed.' "The applicants pay the respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $750.00."]