SCAG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 302
The appeal was dismissed because the Court adopted its reasoning in SCAL and held that the appellants' grounds had no substance: the Tribunal did not err in treating the husband's family as the relevant social group, did not misconstrue or misapply s 91S, and the argument concerning a social group of citizens of Albania subject to the Kanun was rejected.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Protection Visa Proceeding / Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'particular Social Group' 'blood Feud' 'migration Act 1958 (cth) S 91 S' 'refugees Convention']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Protection Visa Proceeding / Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal erred in law in treating the husband's family as the relevant particular social group." 'Whether the Tribunal erred in the construction and application of s 91S of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' 'Whether the alleged social group of citizens of Albania who are subject to the operation of the Kanun comprised the whole community.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the Court adopted its reasoning in SCAL and held that the appellants' grounds had no substance: the Tribunal did not err in treating the husband's family as the relevant social group, did not misconstrue or misapply s 91S, and the argument concerning a social group of citizens of Albania subject to the Kanun was rejected.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment