Applicants S503/2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 133

Applicants S503/2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 133

The current proceeding sought relief indistinguishable from that previously sought and dismissed in the Federal Magistrates Court, and there was no basis to avoid the application of res judicata, issue estoppel, Anshun estoppel or abuse of process. In any event, no appealable error was identified in Jacobson J's reasons rejecting the appellants' claims, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal Concerning an Application for Constitutional Writs / Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Dismissing a Remitted Proceeding
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visas' 'constitutional Writs' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'res Judicata' 'issue Estoppel' 'anshun Estoppel' 'abuse of Process']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['protection Visas' 'constitutional Writs' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'res Judicata' 'issue Estoppel' 'anshun Estoppel' 'abuse of Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal Concerning an Application for Constitutional Writs / Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Dismissing a Remitted Proceeding

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the appellants' application for Constitutional writs was precluded by res judicata, issue estoppel, Anshun estoppel or abuse of process after an earlier Federal Magistrates Court proceeding seeking indistinguishable relief had been dismissed." "Whether any appealable error was identified in Jacobson J's reasons rejecting the appellants' grounds of attack on the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision."]

Ratio Decidendi

The current proceeding sought relief indistinguishable from that previously sought and dismissed in the Federal Magistrates Court, and there was no basis to avoid the application of res judicata, issue estoppel, Anshun estoppel or abuse of process. In any event, no appealable error was identified in Jacobson J's reasons rejecting the appellants' claims, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellants pay the costs of the respondent.']