SZFYM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1303

SZFYM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1303

Leave to appeal was refused because the earlier Federal Magistrates Court decision, affirmed on appeal, created a res judicata between the applicant and the Minister; the applicant raised no fresh ground and identified no jurisdictional error by the RRT, so the further judicial review proceedings were precluded, constituted an abuse of process, and the Magistrate's decision was not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 September 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrate's Judgment Summarily Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed; leave to appeal refused with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'privative Clause Decision' 'res Judicata' 'abuse of Process' 'procedural Fairness']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'refugee Law'] ['protection Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'privative Clause Decision' 'res Judicata' 'abuse of Process' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrate's Judgment Summarily Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrate's dismissal of the judicial review application as incompetent." 'Whether the applicant was precluded by res judicata from bringing further judicial review proceedings concerning the RRT decision.' 'Whether any jurisdictional error by the RRT was identified.' 'Whether the further judicial review proceedings constituted an abuse of process.']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the earlier Federal Magistrates Court decision, affirmed on appeal, created a res judicata between the applicant and the Minister; the applicant raised no fresh ground and identified no jurisdictional error by the RRT, so the further judicial review proceedings were precluded, constituted an abuse of process, and the Magistrate's decision was not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; leave to appeal refused with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The adult applicant pay the respondent's costs."]