SFQB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1189
Section 91S applied to the applicants' review because the statutory commencement and review criteria were satisfied, and it was intended to apply where an applicant claims a well-founded fear of persecution by reason of family membership but that fear depends on persecution or fear experienced by family members for non-Convention reasons. The applicants' claimed fear arose from a blood feud involving family members and therefore fell within s 91S. Their arguments that membership of a family alone established a Convention reason, that s 91S must yield to the Refugees Convention, or that s 91S did not achieve its intended operation were rejected, so the review application had to be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visas / Federal Court Application for Review Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth)
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'refugee Convention' 'membership of a Particular Social Group' 'family as a Particular Social Group' 'blood Feud' 'construction and Validity of S 91 S of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visas / Federal Court Application for Review Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether membership of a particular social group of itself can establish a well-founded fear of persecution for Convention reasons without further enquiry.' 'Whether Parliament can limit or prescribe the application of the Refugees Convention in applications for protection visas.' 'Whether s 91S of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applied to require the Refugee Review Tribunal to disregard fears arising from persecution of family members for non-Convention reasons.' "Whether the applicants' claimed fear arising from an Albanian blood feud was persecution for a Convention reason by reason of membership of their family."]
Ratio Decidendi
Section 91S applied to the applicants' review because the statutory commencement and review criteria were satisfied, and it was intended to apply where an applicant claims a well-founded fear of persecution by reason of family membership but that fear depends on persecution or fear experienced by family members for non-Convention reasons. The applicants' claimed fear arose from a blood feud involving family members and therefore fell within s 91S. Their arguments that membership of a family alone established a Convention reason, that s 91S must yield to the Refugees Convention, or that s 91S did not achieve its intended operation were rejected, so the review application had to be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for review is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment