Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v N 1038 [2000] FCA 1095
The Tribunal failed to comply with section 430(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) because its reasons did not refer to the evidence or other material on which at least part of its findings of fact were based. This failure meant that procedures required to be observed in connection with the making of the decision were not observed; therefore, a ground for review under section 476(1)(a) was established, and the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Full Court Judgment on Appeal From a Single Judge
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'tribunal Procedures' 'grounds of Review' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court Judgment on Appeal From a Single Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) observed the procedures required by s 430(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether there was a failure to comply with s 430(1)(d) by not referring in the reasons to evidence/material on which findings were based' 'Whether such non-compliance is a ground of review under s 476(1)(a)' "Whether the Minister's decision under s 65(1)(a)(ii) depends on RRT’s compliance with s 430(1)"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal failed to comply with section 430(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) because its reasons did not refer to the evidence or other material on which at least part of its findings of fact were based. This failure meant that procedures required to be observed in connection with the making of the decision were not observed; therefore, a ground for review under section 476(1)(a) was established, and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondents' costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment