Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship v SZRNY [2013] FCAFC 104
A visa application is not finally determined for the purpose of s 5(9) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) until the Refugee Review Tribunal has notified both the applicant and the Secretary of its decision in accordance with the Act; notification is a necessary step in completion of the review process under Part 7.
- Parties
- Appellant: Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship; First Respondent: SZRNY; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Final Determination of Visa Applications, Jurisdictional Error, Notification Requirements in Review Process, Complementary Protection Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship
Appellant
SZRNY
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a protection visa application was 'finally determined' for the purpose of s 5(9) Migration Act
- 2 At what point a delegate's decision ceases to be subject to review under Part 7 of the Migration Act
- 3 Whether notification to the applicant is required for finality of determination
Ratio Decidendi
A visa application is not finally determined for the purpose of s 5(9) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) until the Refugee Review Tribunal has notified both the applicant and the Secretary of its decision in accordance with the Act; notification is a necessary step in completion of the review process under Part 7.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment