Hermiz v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1737
The Court found that the Tribunal made clear and unequivocal findings rejecting the applicants' evidence regarding harassment and pursuit, and was not required to make further findings concerning events it disbelieved; accordingly, there was no breach of s 430(1)(c) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), and the application for review must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'judicial Review' 'adequacy of Reasons' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'findings of Fact']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to give adequate reasons under s 430(1)(c) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the Tribunal made an error in not making findings as to what did happen regarding the alleged harassment' 'Whether the applicants had a subjective fear of persecution' "Whether the Tribunal properly applied the Convention definition of 'refugee'" 'Whether the Tribunal properly applied principles relating to internal relocation']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Tribunal made clear and unequivocal findings rejecting the applicants' evidence regarding harassment and pursuit, and was not required to make further findings concerning events it disbelieved; accordingly, there was no breach of s 430(1)(c) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), and the application for review must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicants pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment