NAHY v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1531
The appellants had been informed of the hearing date and had appeared at the appeal book conference, but did not appear at the hearing; in those circumstances the Court acceded to the Minister's request to dismiss the appeal under O 52 r 38A.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visas / Appeal Dismissed After No Appearance by the Appellants
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa Refusal' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'dismissal of Appeal for Non Appearance' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visas / Appeal Dismissed After No Appearance by the Appellants
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should be dismissed under O 52 r 38A of the Federal Court Rules after the appellants failed to appear at the hearing.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants had been informed of the hearing date and had appeared at the appeal book conference, but did not appear at the hearing; in those circumstances the Court acceded to the Minister's request to dismiss the appeal under O 52 r 38A.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellants pay the costs of the Respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment