SZCIX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1399
No justification or arguable ground for the grant of leave to appeal was provided; the application disclosed no reasonable cause of action; in the circumstances, leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed as incompetent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused; notice of appeal dismissed as incompetent; costs ordered against applicants.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from dismissal of application for judicial review by the Federal Magistrates Court' 'Whether the original application disclosed any reasonable cause of action' 'Whether there was any error of law or jurisdictional error']
Ratio Decidendi
No justification or arguable ground for the grant of leave to appeal was provided; the application disclosed no reasonable cause of action; in the circumstances, leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed as incompetent.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused; notice of appeal dismissed as incompetent; costs ordered against applicants.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal be refused from the orders of Federal Magistrate Raphael made on 4 June 2004.' 'The notice of appeal be dismissed as incompetent.' "The applicants pay the Minister's costs of the application for leave and of the appeal in the sum of $3000."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment