Amalgamated Society of Engineers Claimant; and Adelaide Steamship Company Limited [1920] HCA 54
The Commonwealth Parliament, under sec. 51 (xxxv.) of the Constitution, has power to make laws binding on the States regarding conciliation and arbitration for industrial disputes extending beyond the limits of one State, and disputes involving State agencies as employers are 'industrial disputes' within sec. 51 (xxxv.); supremacy of the Commonwealth law prevails over State law under sec. 109.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Amalgamated Society of Engineers; Respondents: The Adelaide Steamship Company Limited and others; Respondent: Minister for Trading Concerns, Western Australia; Respondent: State Implement and Engineering Works, North Fremantle; Respondent: State Sawmills, D. Humphries, Perth; Intervener: Commonwealth of Australia; Intervener: State of Victoria; Intervener: State of South Australia; Intervener: State of Tasmania; Intervener: State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 1920
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case Stated Under the Judiciary Act for the Full Court, Hearing of a Summons Under Sec. 214 a of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act / Full High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Majority decision (Knox C.J., Isaacs, Rich, Starke, Higgins JJ) in favour of claimant; dissent by Gavan Duffy J.
- Legal Topics
- Federal State Relations, Interpretation of Constitution, Commonwealth Powers, Industrial Disputes, Crown Liability, Supremacy of Commonwealth Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Amalgamated Society of Engineers
Claimant
The Adelaide Steamship Company Limited and others
Respondents
Minister for Trading Concerns, Western Australia
Respondent
State Implement and Engineering Works, North Fremantle
Respondent
State Sawmills, D. Humphries, Perth
Respondent
Commonwealth of Australia
Intervener
State of Victoria
Intervener
State of South Australia
Intervener
State of Tasmania
Intervener
State of New South Wales
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Special Case Stated Under the Judiciary Act for the Full Court, Hearing of a Summons Under Sec. 214 a of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act / Full High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commonwealth Parliament has power to make laws binding on the States with respect to conciliation and arbitration for industrial disputes extending beyond the limits of one State
- 2 Whether an industrial dispute involving a State agency is an 'industrial dispute' within sec. 51 (xxxv.) of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The Commonwealth Parliament, under sec. 51 (xxxv.) of the Constitution, has power to make laws binding on the States regarding conciliation and arbitration for industrial disputes extending beyond the limits of one State, and disputes involving State agencies as employers are 'industrial disputes' within sec. 51 (xxxv.); supremacy of the Commonwealth law prevails over State law under sec. 109.
Court Disposition
Majority decision (Knox C.J., Isaacs, Rich, Starke, Higgins JJ) in favour of claimant; dissent by Gavan Duffy J.
Orders
- Questions as amended answered: (1) Yes; (2) Yes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment