Ministry of Transport v Kharbanda (GD) [2006] NSWADTAP 61
Leave to appeal out of time was refused because the explanation for failing to file in time was not acceptable, the applicant was a sophisticated litigant and the consequences of the delay did not warrant the exercise of the Tribunal's discretion. There was insufficient public interest or prejudice to override the...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal Out of Time—interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal out of time refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'taxi Driver Authority Suspension' 'administrative Review']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal Out of Time—interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted to the appellant' "Whether an administrative error or solicitor's omission constitutes a reasonable explanation for delay in appealing" 'Whether public interest or prejudice to the respondent warrants granting leave']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal out of time was refused because the explanation for failing to file in time was not acceptable, the applicant was a sophisticated litigant and the consequences of the delay did not warrant the exercise of the Tribunal's discretion. There was insufficient public interest or prejudice to override the absence of a reasonable explanation.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal out of time refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal out of time refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment