Environment Protection Authority v Minto Recycling Pty Limited [2019] NSWLEC 193

Environment Protection Authority v Minto Recycling Pty Limited [2019] NSWLEC 193

The only aggravating factor established beyond reasonable doubt was that the offence was committed for financial gain. Substantial environmental harm and harm to human health were not proved to the required standard. The objective seriousness of the offending conduct was assessed as at the top of the low range. A 25% discount for the guilty plea was applied, resulting in a penalty of $90,000, to be paid to the Environmental Trust in lieu of a fine. Orders for publication and costs were also made.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 December 2019
Procedural Posture
Sentencing for Environmental Offence (breach of Licence Condition) / Principal Judgment on Sentence
Outcome
Defendant convicted and sentenced; penalty imposed; ancillary orders made.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'environmental Offences' 'breach of Environmental Protection Licence' 'financial Benefit as Aggravation' 'discount for Guilty Plea']
['environmental Law' 'criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'environmental Offences' 'breach of Environmental Protection Licence' 'financial Benefit as Aggravation' 'discount for Guilty Plea']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Sentencing for Environmental Offence (breach of Licence Condition) / Principal Judgment on Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether aggravating factors including substantial environmental harm and harm to human health were proved beyond reasonable doubt; Whether the offending conduct was committed for financial gain; Appropriate penalty for breach of environment protection licence condition']

Ratio Decidendi

The only aggravating factor established beyond reasonable doubt was that the offence was committed for financial gain. Substantial environmental harm and harm to human health were not proved to the required standard. The objective seriousness of the offending conduct was assessed as at the top of the low range. A 25% discount for the guilty plea was applied, resulting in a penalty of $90,000, to be paid to the Environmental Trust in lieu of a fine. Orders for publication and costs were also made.

Court Disposition

Defendant convicted and sentenced; penalty imposed; ancillary orders made.

Orders

  • ['Minto Recycling Pty Ltd convicted of the offence as charged.' 'Within 28 days, pay $90,000 to the Environmental Trust established under the Environmental Trust Act 1998.' 'Within 28 days, publish a notice in the Australian Financial Review, The Daily Telegraph, Campbelltown-Macarthur Advertiser, and Inside Waste...