Chanel Limited v Kim [2007] FCA 2076
Section 137(5) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) does not preclude the Court from making an order restraining the Customs CEO from releasing seized goods, even after expiration of the 20 working day period. The Court retains the power to make such an order, and such relief is appropriate in this case.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Infringement Action / Application for Order Restraining Release of Seized Goods
- Outcome
- Order made restraining release of seized goods until further order.
- Legal Topics
- ['seizure of Infringing Goods' 'statutory Construction' 'release of Seized Goods' 'trade Mark Infringement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Infringement Action / Application for Order Restraining Release of Seized Goods
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the court can make an order restraining release of seized goods after the 20 working day period under section 137(5) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) has expired.']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 137(5) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) does not preclude the Court from making an order restraining the Customs CEO from releasing seized goods, even after expiration of the 20 working day period. The Court retains the power to make such an order, and such relief is appropriate in this case.
Court Disposition
Order made restraining release of seized goods until further order.
Orders
- ["The Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs Services is restrained, until further order, from releasing the consignment of 100 scarves, bearing the CHANEL mark and/or Chanel Crossed C's Device, seized pursuant to s 133 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) on 19 September 2007 (reference 200708541)." 'A...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment