Belokozovski v Magarey [2014] NSWDC 5

Belokozovski v Magarey [2014] NSWDC 5

The defendant breached their duty of care by not obtaining pre-operative liver function tests and by failing to perform an intra-operative cholangiogram during the plaintiff's surgery, which led to the plaintiff experiencing a severe pain attack, subsequent emergency hospitalisation, and surgical intervention in 2008. The use of non-absorbable sutures did not amount to negligence as it conformed to widely accepted professional practice. Psychiatric injury and economic loss were not found to have been caused by the defendant's breach.

Parties
Plaintiff: Mirce Belokozovski; Defendant: Christopher John Magarey
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Verdict for the plaintiff for $23,865
Legal Topics
Medical Negligence, Causation, Duty of Care, Breach of Duty, Civil Liability Act 2002, Psychiatric Injury
Tort Law Medical Negligence Causation Duty of Care Breach of Duty Civil Liability Act 2002 Psychiatric Injury

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mirce Belokozovski

Plaintiff

Christopher John Magarey

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was negligent in failing to obtain liver function tests before surgery
  2. 2 Whether the defendant was negligent in failing to perform an intra-operative cholangiogram (IOC) during surgery
  3. 3 Whether the defendant was negligent in using non-absorbable sutures rather than absorbable sutures

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant breached their duty of care by not obtaining pre-operative liver function tests and by failing to perform an intra-operative cholangiogram during the plaintiff's surgery, which led to the plaintiff experiencing a severe pain attack, subsequent emergency hospitalisation, and surgical intervention in 2008. The use of non-absorbable sutures did not amount to negligence as it conformed to widely accepted professional practice. Psychiatric injury and economic loss were not found to have been caused by the defendant's breach.

Court Disposition

Verdict for the plaintiff for $23,865

Orders

  • Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $23,865.
  • The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings.