Miletich v Murchie [2012] FCA 1013

Miletich v Murchie [2012] FCA 1013

The applicants relied on misleading and deceptive representations by the respondents as to tenancy mix and patronage at the Foundry, inducing them to invest and operate a Jamaica Blue cafe that failed due to absence of other tenants and customers. The representations made were not only misleading but relied upon and caused quantifiable losses, for which the responsible respondents, including Stephen Donnelly, are liable, and apportionment of liability provisions do not displace full liability due to vicarious liability and absence of proper pleadings for limitation. The total awarded loss is subject to adjustment for any settlement already received by applicants from other parties.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Judgment and Orders
Outcome
Judgment for applicants against third and fourth respondents (83 East Pty Ltd and Stephen Francis Donnelly), subject to further evidence of settlement amounts.
Legal Topics
['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'apportionment of Liability' 'damages' 'reliance' 'franchise Law' 'vicarious Liability' 'statutory Interpretation']
['consumer Protection' 'trade Practices' 'commercial Law' 'tort Law'] ['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'apportionment of Liability' 'damages' 'reliance' 'franchise Law' 'vicarious Liability' 'statutory Interpretation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Trial Judgment and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether representations regarding tenancy mix and patronage in the Foundry shopping centre were misleading and deceptive' 'Whether applicants relied on those representations' "Calculation and assessment of applicants' loss and damage" 'Appropriate apportionment of liability among concurrent wrongdoers' 'Effect of settlement with part of defendants on damages and apportionment']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants relied on misleading and deceptive representations by the respondents as to tenancy mix and patronage at the Foundry, inducing them to invest and operate a Jamaica Blue cafe that failed due to absence of other tenants and customers. The representations made were not only misleading but relied upon and caused quantifiable losses, for which the responsible respondents, including Stephen Donnelly, are liable, and apportionment of liability provisions do not displace full liability due to vicarious liability and absence of proper pleadings for limitation. The total awarded loss is subject to adjustment for any settlement already received by applicants from other parties.

Court Disposition

Judgment for applicants against third and fourth respondents (83 East Pty Ltd and Stephen Francis Donnelly), subject to further evidence of settlement amounts.

Orders

  • ['Applicants to file and serve affidavit detailing settlement with first and second respondents, including amount claimed to be entitled to deduct for costs' 'Applicants to file and serve minutes of proposed orders reflecting reasons for judgment' 'Further hearing listed for submissions as to appropriate orders' "83...