WENTWORTH v RARES [No 1] [1990] NSWCA 184
Leave to appeal was refused because there was no demonstrated error of principle or misunderstanding of fact by the trial judge, and the costs order fell within accepted principles.
- Parties
- Applicant: Miss Wentworth; Respondent: Mr Rares
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application
- Outcome
- leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Leave to Appeal, Contempt Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1
Parties
Miss Wentworth
Applicant
Mr Rares
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal against a costs order should be granted
- 2 Whether there was error of principle or misunderstanding of fact by the trial judge in making the costs order
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because there was no demonstrated error of principle or misunderstanding of fact by the trial judge, and the costs order fell within accepted principles.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal refused
Orders
- leave to appeal against costs order refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment