R v Aporo [2000] NSWCCA 48
The sentence of four years for threatening a witness, though imposed to reflect total criminality, was excessive when measured against comparable cases and sentencing statistics; the appeal should be allowed and the sentence reduced.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'threaten Witness' 'impositions for Related Assaults Served Within Encompassing Term' 'pattern of Sentence' 'sentencing Statistics']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed for threatening a witness was manifestly excessive' 'Whether special circumstances justified a departure from standard sentencing']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of four years for threatening a witness, though imposed to reflect total criminality, was excessive when measured against comparable cases and sentencing statistics; the appeal should be allowed and the sentence reduced.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Application for leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal allowed' 'Sentence on count 4 (threatening a witness) quashed' "New sentence imposed: total term of two years' imprisonment, minimum term one year six months, additional term six months, all commencing 13 October 1998" 'Applicant to be released to parole on 12 April...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment