MITAKOS v KLIDES [1997] NSWCA 208
The trial judge's findings that the oral agreement included a right of renewal were open on the evidence and not open to appellate intervention; arguments as to enforceability under s 54A and uncertainty were not raised below and could not be raised for the first time on appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mitakos; Respondent: Klides
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Lease, Oral Agreement, Memorandum of Lease, Repudiation, Damages, Conveyancing Act 1919 S 54 a
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mitakos
Appellant
Klides
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the oral agreement for lease contained a term entitling tenants to an option for a three year renewal
- 2 Whether the absence of a sufficient memorandum made the oral agreement unenforceable under Conveyancing Act 1919, s 54A
- 3 Whether the oral term for the option of renewal was void for uncertainty
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's findings that the oral agreement included a right of renewal were open on the evidence and not open to appellate intervention; arguments as to enforceability under s 54A and uncertainty were not raised below and could not be raised for the first time on appeal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment