Kalloghlian v Mitry Lawyers Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 845
The plaintiff, by raising allegations under s 99 regarding the conduct of Mitry Lawyers, waived privilege over communications with counsel during the relevant period, except those involving Mr Hetherington. Accordingly, the plaintiff is required to give discovery of all such communications within Category 5, save for those concerning Mr Hetherington.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Avedis Kalloghlian; Respondent: Mitry Lawyers Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Technology and Construction List / Procedural Ruling on Discovery and Costs
- Outcome
- Orders made for discovery and on costs.
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Privilege, Legal Costs, Section 99 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (nsw)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Avedis Kalloghlian
Plaintiff/applicant
Mitry Lawyers Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Equity Technology and Construction List / Procedural Ruling on Discovery and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is required to give discovery of communications with counsel during the relevant period
- 2 Whether privilege was waived over those communications due to the plaintiff's case under s 99
- 3 Scope of discovery in the context of an application to disallow legal fees under s 99 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff, by raising allegations under s 99 regarding the conduct of Mitry Lawyers, waived privilege over communications with counsel during the relevant period, except those involving Mr Hetherington. Accordingly, the plaintiff is required to give discovery of all such communications within Category 5, save for those concerning Mr Hetherington.
Court Disposition
Orders made for discovery and on costs.
Orders
- Plaintiffs to give discovery of documents in Mitry Lawyers' Category 5, save for those concerning Mr Hetherington.
- Costs of the plaintiff's Notice of Motion of 16 May 2022 to be costs in the plaintiff's Notice of Motion of 7 September 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment