MJH Built Pty Ltd v Robinson [2020] NSWCATAP 133
The Appeal Panel held that no error of law or misapplication of the onus of proof was made by the Tribunal; the Tribunal's findings on credibility, expert evidence, and quantum were reasonably open; and the appellant failed to establish any ground warranting leave or substantive appeal. The appeal was dismissed and the stay order lifted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['onus of Proof' 'appeals' 'home Building Defects' 'credibility of Witnesses' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal misapplied the onus of proof to the homeowner regarding defects and rectification' 'Whether the Tribunal made errors of law in accepting expert evidence and determining credit of witnesses' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted on specific grounds concerning findings of defect, quantum, and costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel held that no error of law or misapplication of the onus of proof was made by the Tribunal; the Tribunal's findings on credibility, expert evidence, and quantum were reasonably open; and the appellant failed to establish any ground warranting leave or substantive appeal. The appeal was dismissed and the stay order lifted.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is refused' 'The appeal is dismissed' 'The stay order made 10 October 2019 is lifted' 'The Registry is directed to pay the monies held in trust to the respondent immediately' 'The respondent is to provide to the Appeal Panel and the appellant, submissions and documents in relation to any...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment