Vujinovic v R [2024] NSWCCA 10

Vujinovic v R [2024] NSWCCA 10

The differences between the subjective cases and individual roles of the applicant and his two co-offenders were not significant enough to produce a great difference in their sentences. The degree of disparity was unreasonable or irrational and indicates that the sentencing discretion miscarried. Appeal allowed and applicant resentenced to a period slightly longer than his co-offenders, consistent with the sentencing judge’s initial findings on relative culpability.

Parties
Applicant: Mladen Vujinovic; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Sentence quashed. Applicant resentenced.
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Sentence, Parity, Disparity Between Sentences, Trafficking in Controlled Substances, Dealing With Proceeds of Crime
Criminal Law Appeal Against Sentence Parity Disparity Between Sentences Trafficking in Controlled Substances Dealing With Proceeds of Crime

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mladen Vujinovic

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a marked disparity between the sentence imposed on the applicant and the sentences imposed on his co-offenders so as to give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing discretion miscarried

Ratio Decidendi

The differences between the subjective cases and individual roles of the applicant and his two co-offenders were not significant enough to produce a great difference in their sentences. The degree of disparity was unreasonable or irrational and indicates that the sentencing discretion miscarried. Appeal allowed and applicant resentenced to a period slightly longer than his co-offenders, consistent with the sentencing judge’s initial findings on relative culpability.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Sentence quashed. Applicant resentenced.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted.
  • Appeal allowed.