SafeWork NSW v MMP Industrial Pty Ltd [2022] NSWDC 581

SafeWork NSW v MMP Industrial Pty Ltd [2022] NSWDC 581

MMP Industrial Pty Ltd failed to take reasonably practicable steps to eliminate or minimise the risk of injury from unguarded machinery, in breach of its duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. The risk was obvious, the necessary precautions were simple and inexpensive, and the failure led to serious injury. A conviction was warranted, and the penalty must reflect both general and specific deterrence, with due allowance for the plea of guilty and post-incident remedial actions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing
Outcome
Convicted. Fine imposed. Orders for costs and payment to prosecutor.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'employer Duties' 'workplace Injury' 'risk Assessment' 'machine Guarding' 'deterrence' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors']
['criminal Law' 'work Health and Safety'] ['sentencing' 'employer Duties' 'workplace Injury' 'risk Assessment' 'machine Guarding' 'deterrence' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether MMP Industrial Pty Ltd failed to comply with its health and safety duty under s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011, exposing an employee to risk of death or serious injury' 'Appropriate penalty and application of sentencing principles']

Ratio Decidendi

MMP Industrial Pty Ltd failed to take reasonably practicable steps to eliminate or minimise the risk of injury from unguarded machinery, in breach of its duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. The risk was obvious, the necessary precautions were simple and inexpensive, and the failure led to serious injury. A conviction was warranted, and the penalty must reflect both general and specific deterrence, with due allowance for the plea of guilty and post-incident remedial actions.

Court Disposition

Convicted. Fine imposed. Orders for costs and payment to prosecutor.

Orders

  • ['MMP Industrial Pty Ltd is convicted.' 'Fine of $262,500 imposed (after 25% discount for plea of guilty).' "Offender to pay prosecutor's costs, as agreed or assessed." 'Pursuant to s 122(2) Fines Act 1996, 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.']