SafeWork NSW v Modco Homes Pty Ltd [2024] NSWDC 565
The offences were objectively serious due to the failure to enforce safety procedures resulting in risk of death or serious injury, including breach of notification and site-preservation duties following notifiable incidents. Penalties were reduced by 25% for the utilitarian value of an early guilty plea, considering the defendant's otherwise good character, remorse, cooperation, and subsequent remedial actions.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: SafeWork NSW; Defendant: Modco Homes Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction and imposition of fines with costs orders
- Legal Topics
- Prosecution, Duty of Persons Undertaking Business, Risk of Death or Serious Injury, Sentencing, Objective Seriousness, Mitigating Factors, Aggravating Factors, Plea of Guilty, General Deterrence, Specific Deterrence, Remorse, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SafeWork NSW
Prosecutor
Modco Homes Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Failure to ensure health and safety of workers contrary to s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)
- 2 Failure to notify regulator of a notifiable incident (s 38(1) WHS Act)
- 3 Failure to preserve notifiable incident site (s 39(1) WHS Act)
Ratio Decidendi
The offences were objectively serious due to the failure to enforce safety procedures resulting in risk of death or serious injury, including breach of notification and site-preservation duties following notifiable incidents. Penalties were reduced by 25% for the utilitarian value of an early guilty plea, considering the defendant's otherwise good character, remorse, cooperation, and subsequent remedial actions.
Court Disposition
Conviction and imposition of fines with costs orders
Orders
- Modco Homes Pty Ltd is convicted in each proceeding.
- For the offence under s 19(1) (file 2023/198178), a fine of $80,000 is reduced by 25% to $60,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment