Modular Nominees Pty Ltd v Berrached [1999] FCA 237
The requirement to annex the actual bankruptcy notice under O 77 r 12(2) can be dispensed with using O 1 r 8, as the Rules allow the court discretion to relax procedural requirements; conditions for substituted service are satisfied due to the respondent's unknown overseas location and demonstrated impracticality of personal service.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Application for Substituted Service
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['substituted Service' 'service Outside Jurisdiction' 'compliance With Bankruptcy Procedure' 'dispensation of Rules']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Application for Substituted Service
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether requirement to annex actual bankruptcy notice to substituted service application can be dispensed with' 'Whether it is impractical to serve the respondent personally as required by the Federal Court Rules']
Ratio Decidendi
The requirement to annex the actual bankruptcy notice under O 77 r 12(2) can be dispensed with using O 1 r 8, as the Rules allow the court discretion to relax procedural requirements; conditions for substituted service are satisfied due to the respondent's unknown overseas location and demonstrated impracticality of personal service.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['Personal service and service per Regulation 16.01 of the Bankruptcy Regulations dispensed with.' "Service by sending a copy of the bankruptcy notice and this order to the respondent's solicitor by post." 'Strict compliance with Order 77 rule 12(2) dispensed with.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment