Tanious v Hunt [2012] NSWCA 51
The Notice of Motion was dismissed because it did not have any rational relationship with the appeal proceedings, sought to impugn a subsequent decision of the Public Guardian rather than the ADT Appeal Panel decision under appeal, and no statute conferred a direct right of appeal to the Court from decisions of the Public Guardian.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion in Appeal Proceedings / Hearing of Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- The Notice of Motion filed by Mr Tanious on 27 February 2012 is dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['notice of Motion' 'guardianship Order' 'public Guardian Decisions' 'appeal Rights']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Appeal Proceedings / Hearing of Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Notice of Motion had a rational relationship with the appeal proceedings challenging the ADT Appeal Panel decision of 2 February 2012.' 'Whether there was a statutory right of appeal directly to the Court against decisions of the Public Guardian.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Notice of Motion was dismissed because it did not have any rational relationship with the appeal proceedings, sought to impugn a subsequent decision of the Public Guardian rather than the ADT Appeal Panel decision under appeal, and no statute conferred a direct right of appeal to the Court from decisions of the Public Guardian.
Court Disposition
The Notice of Motion filed by Mr Tanious on 27 February 2012 is dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The Notice of Motion filed by Mr Tanious on 27 February 2012 be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment