Mogul Mining [1999] NSWSC 159
The Court made the convening orders because the scheme was in most respects straightforward, with major creditors consenting, only one class of shareholders, no proposal to bind other parties such as optionholders, and no requirement for an expert's report, while noting that disclosure about Augusta could be scrutinised at the second hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Company Members' Scheme of Arrangement Under S 411 of the Corporations Law / Application for Orders to Convene a Meeting of Members
- Outcome
- Orders made to convene the scheme meeting.
- Legal Topics
- ["members' Scheme of Arrangement" 'reduction of Capital' 'disclosure for Share Consideration' 'convening Scheme Meeting']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Company Members' Scheme of Arrangement Under S 411 of the Corporations Law / Application for Orders to Convene a Meeting of Members
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether orders should be made to convene a meeting of members to consider a scheme of arrangement under s 411 of the Corporations Law.' 'Whether the scheme explanatory statement or notice should disclose information about Augusta to a level satisfying the disclosure standard of s 1022.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court made the convening orders because the scheme was in most respects straightforward, with major creditors consenting, only one class of shareholders, no proposal to bind other parties such as optionholders, and no requirement for an expert's report, while noting that disclosure about Augusta could be scrutinised at the second hearing.
Court Disposition
Orders made to convene the scheme meeting.
Orders
- ['Orders one to nine of the draft orders handed up by counsel and initialled by the Court for identification were made.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment