El-Husseini v Saadie [2016] NSWDC 359

El-Husseini v Saadie [2016] NSWDC 359

The plaintiff failed to provide a full and satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging his motor accident claim; insufficient evidence was given regarding advice from lawyers and medical professionals, and relevant conduct during the delay period, such that the court could not be satisfied within the statutory requirements of Section 73(7) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW). Therefore, the plaintiff's Statement of Claim was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil / Notice of Motion to Dismiss Statement of Claim
Outcome
Plaintiff's Statement of Claim dismissed; costs awarded to second defendant
Legal Topics
['negligence' 'late Filing' 'full and Satisfactory Explanation for Delay']
['tort' 'motor Accidents'] ['negligence' 'late Filing' 'full and Satisfactory Explanation for Delay']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Notice of Motion to Dismiss Statement of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff provided a full and satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging his motor accident claim under Section 73 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW)']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to provide a full and satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging his motor accident claim; insufficient evidence was given regarding advice from lawyers and medical professionals, and relevant conduct during the delay period, such that the court could not be satisfied within the statutory requirements of Section 73(7) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW). Therefore, the plaintiff's Statement of Claim was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's Statement of Claim dismissed; costs awarded to second defendant

Orders

  • ["The plaintiff's Statement of Claim filed on 18 January 2016 is dismissed." "The plaintiff is to pay the second defendant's costs of the Notice of Motion filed on 24 August 2016 and the costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed." "The parties have liberty to apply on two business days' notice to vary the order...