Nasrallah v R; R v Nasrallah [2015] NSWCCA 188

Nasrallah v R; R v Nasrallah [2015] NSWCCA 188

Federal Agent Succar's evidence was inadmissible because he had no prior familiarity with the appellant's voice and had acquired no specialised experience beyond what the jury could acquire by listening to the same recordings; his asserted cultural and Arabic-language experience did not qualify him to identify the appellant as the speaker. The wrongly admitted evidence, combined with counsel's uninstructed concession that 20 DHL calls were the appellant's voice and the resulting lack of a full identification warning, caused the trial to miscarry. The proviso was not applied because doing so would require the appellate court to make a new factual voice-comparison determination that the...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Conviction and Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision After Trial in the Sydney District Court
Outcome
Appeal against conviction allowed; conviction quashed and new trial ordered; Crown appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Conviction' 'ad Hoc Expert Voice Identification Evidence' 'opinion Evidence' 'identification Evidence Warning' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'proviso' 'crown Appeal Against Sentence']
['criminal Law' 'evidence' 'criminal Procedure'] ['appeal Against Conviction' 'ad Hoc Expert Voice Identification Evidence' 'opinion Evidence' 'identification Evidence Warning' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'proviso' 'crown Appeal Against Sentence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Against Conviction and Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision After Trial in the Sydney District Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the trial judge erred in admitting Federal Agent Succar's evidence as ad hoc expert voice identification evidence under s 79 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)." "Whether defence counsel's concession in closing address that the appellant was the caller in 20 of the 21 DHL calls, allegedly made without instructions, caused unfairness or a miscarriage of justice." 'Whether the proviso in s 6(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) should be applied despite the error in admission of evidence.']

Ratio Decidendi

Federal Agent Succar's evidence was inadmissible because he had no prior familiarity with the appellant's voice and had acquired no specialised experience beyond what the jury could acquire by listening to the same recordings; his asserted cultural and Arabic-language experience did not qualify him to identify the appellant as the speaker. The wrongly admitted evidence, combined with counsel's uninstructed concession that 20 DHL calls were the appellant's voice and the resulting lack of a full identification warning, caused the trial to miscarry. The proviso was not applied because doing so would require the appellate court to make a new factual voice-comparison determination that the...

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction allowed; conviction quashed and new trial ordered; Crown appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Appeal against conviction allowed.' 'Conviction quashed.' 'New trial ordered.' 'Crown appeal dismissed.']