Hussain v Shahidulalam [2018] NSWSC 1742

Hussain v Shahidulalam [2018] NSWSC 1742

The plaintiff was given reasonable opportunities to prepare and present his case, and the Magistrate considered the material relied on for an adjournment, including unsatisfactory medical evidence that did not establish that the plaintiff was unable to attend and prosecute the Local Court proceedings. The refusal to adjourn involved no denial of natural justice and no reviewable error in the exercise of discretion. The apprehended bias allegation was unsupported by the transcript or other material. The appeal involved mixed law and fact and concerned an interlocutory judgment, so leave was required; given the weak substantive claim, lengthy delays and the plaintiff's conduct of the...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Local Court Civil Proceedings / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Summary Dismissal
Outcome
Extension of time granted; leave to appeal refused; to the extent necessary appeal dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Judgment' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'adjournment' 'apprehended Bias' 'summary Dismissal' 'case Management' 'limitation Period']
['civil Procedure' 'appeals' 'debt Recovery'] ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Judgment' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'adjournment' 'apprehended Bias' 'summary Dismissal' 'case Management' 'limitation Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Local Court Civil Proceedings / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Summary Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff should be granted an extension of time to file the appeal.' 'Whether leave to appeal was required because the appeal involved mixed law and fact or an interlocutory judgment.' 'Whether the Local Court denied natural justice or erred in refusing to adjourn the proceedings on 18 August 2016.' 'Whether there was any basis for apprehended bias by the Magistrate.' "Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to appeal from the Local Court's dismissal of his proceedings."]

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff was given reasonable opportunities to prepare and present his case, and the Magistrate considered the material relied on for an adjournment, including unsatisfactory medical evidence that did not establish that the plaintiff was unable to attend and prosecute the Local Court proceedings. The refusal to adjourn involved no denial of natural justice and no reviewable error in the exercise of discretion. The apprehended bias allegation was unsupported by the transcript or other material. The appeal involved mixed law and fact and concerned an interlocutory judgment, so leave was required; given the weak substantive claim, lengthy delays and the plaintiff's conduct of the...

Court Disposition

Extension of time granted; leave to appeal refused; to the extent necessary appeal dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs.

Orders

  • ['The plaintiff is granted an extension of time such as would allow the appeal to be filed on the date it was filed, namely, 14 February 2017.' 'Leave to appeal refused.' 'To the extent necessary, and not covered by the refusal of leave to appeal, appeal dismissed.' "The plaintiff shall pay the defendant's costs of...