Khan & Anor v Khan & Anor [2004] NSWSC 1189

Khan & Anor v Khan & Anor [2004] NSWSC 1189

The memorandum of 30 September 2003 could not be enforced against Mrs Sadiq because she signed it under the religious influence of Mufti Naiem, the plaintiffs were present and aware of that influence and its effect on her will, and their reliance on the memorandum was therefore unconscientious. The alternative claim failed because the parties did not intend an oral contract for sale to arise before the normal exchange of formal contracts, and the acts relied on were referable to a licence to occupy in contemplation of a future contract rather than to an existing oral contract for sale.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Proceedings Seeking Specific Performance of an Alleged Contract for Sale of Land / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Order for specific performance refused; plaintiffs' claims dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['undue Influence' 'third Party Undue Influence' 'specific Performance' 'sale of Land' 'statute of Frauds' 'part Performance' 'formal Exchange of Contracts']
['equity' 'contract Law' 'property Law'] ['undue Influence' 'third Party Undue Influence' 'specific Performance' 'sale of Land' 'statute of Frauds' 'part Performance' 'formal Exchange of Contracts']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Proceedings Seeking Specific Performance of an Alleged Contract for Sale of Land / Final Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the memorandum dated 30 September 2003 was enforceable as a contract for sale of the Bonnyrigg property.' 'Whether Mrs Sadiq signed the memorandum and contract under undue influence exerted by Mufti Naiem, and whether the plaintiffs knowingly took advantage of that influence.' 'Whether an earlier oral contract for sale of land existed despite the contemplated formal exchange of contracts.' "Whether the plaintiffs' possession, repairs and sale of their existing house were acts of part performance referable to an oral contract for sale."]

Ratio Decidendi

The memorandum of 30 September 2003 could not be enforced against Mrs Sadiq because she signed it under the religious influence of Mufti Naiem, the plaintiffs were present and aware of that influence and its effect on her will, and their reliance on the memorandum was therefore unconscientious. The alternative claim failed because the parties did not intend an oral contract for sale to arise before the normal exchange of formal contracts, and the acts relied on were referable to a licence to occupy in contemplation of a future contract rather than to an existing oral contract for sale.

Court Disposition

Order for specific performance refused; plaintiffs' claims dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ["The plaintiffs' claims in the statement of claim are dismissed with costs."]