Baquayee v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 103
Grounds of appeal were not sustained; there was no error by the trial judge in admitting identification evidence, the inclusion of alternative counts did not involve double jeopardy, and jury directions regarding silence were adequate to circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- extension of time to appeal granted; appeal against conviction dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trial Procedure' 'in Court Identification' 'double Jeopardy' 'jury Directions' 'right to Silence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['admissibility of in-court identification evidence under s 114 Evidence Act 1995' 'whether alternative counts in indictment violate double jeopardy principles' "adequacy of judge's warning regarding accused's silence at trial"]
Ratio Decidendi
Grounds of appeal were not sustained; there was no error by the trial judge in admitting identification evidence, the inclusion of alternative counts did not involve double jeopardy, and jury directions regarding silence were adequate to circumstances.
Court Disposition
extension of time to appeal granted; appeal against conviction dismissed
Orders
- ['extension of time to appeal granted' 'conviction appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment