Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs & Anor v Bouy [1995] FCA 89

Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs & Anor v Bouy [1995] FCA 89

Because key findings made by the primary judge on alleged apprehended bias and alleged failure by the Minister to disabuse delegates were reversed on appeal, and because considerable time was taken in preparation, evidence and submissions on issues on which the respondent failed at trial or on appeal, the Court substituted its own costs discretion and ordered the first appellant to pay only one-half of the respondent's first instance costs, including reserved costs, with no costs order against Mr Paterson.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 March 1995
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Determination of Costs of the Proceeding at First Instance After Appeal Judgment
Outcome
The Court determined the remaining question of first instance costs by ordering partial costs in favour of the respondent against the first appellant only.
Legal Topics
['costs Discretion' 'appellate Interference With Costs Orders' 'issue Based Costs' 'apprehended Bias']
['civil Procedure' 'administrative Law' 'immigration Law'] ['costs Discretion' 'appellate Interference With Costs Orders' 'issue Based Costs' 'apprehended Bias']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Determination of Costs of the Proceeding at First Instance After Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the appellate court should interfere with the primary judge's discretion on costs." 'What order should be made for the costs of the proceeding before Keely J. at first instance, including reserved costs.' 'Whether an order for costs of the proceeding at first instance should be made against Mr Paterson.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because key findings made by the primary judge on alleged apprehended bias and alleged failure by the Minister to disabuse delegates were reversed on appeal, and because considerable time was taken in preparation, evidence and submissions on issues on which the respondent failed at trial or on appeal, the Court substituted its own costs discretion and ordered the first appellant to pay only one-half of the respondent's first instance costs, including reserved costs, with no costs order against Mr Paterson.

Court Disposition

The Court determined the remaining question of first instance costs by ordering partial costs in favour of the respondent against the first appellant only.

Orders

  • ["The first appellant pay one-half of the respondent's costs of the proceeding at first instance including reserved costs." 'No order for costs of the proceeding at first instance be made against Mr Paterson.']