MONAHAN V. MONAHAN
No security for costs is required for an appeal to the High Court from the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory unless ordered by the High Court; in this instance, an order is made for the appellant to pay £1 security.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Monahan (Wife); Respondent: Monahan (Husband)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 1948
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Summons for Directions in Appeal
- Outcome
- Order that appellant pay security for costs of £1 within 7 days; otherwise, upon such payment, appeal deemed duly instituted.
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Marriage, Security for Costs, Appeals From Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Monahan (Wife)
Appellant
Monahan (Husband)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Summons for Directions in Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Is security for costs required for an appeal from the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory to the High Court under the relevant Acts and Rules?
Ratio Decidendi
No security for costs is required for an appeal to the High Court from the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory unless ordered by the High Court; in this instance, an order is made for the appellant to pay £1 security.
Court Disposition
Order that appellant pay security for costs of £1 within 7 days; otherwise, upon such payment, appeal deemed duly instituted.
Orders
- Appellant to pay £1 into the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory within 7 days from the date of this order.
- Upon payment, the appeal is deemed to be duly instituted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment