Monash University v Murthi (Costs) [2024] FCA 783

Monash University v Murthi (Costs) [2024] FCA 783

No order as to costs because the applicant did not engage in any unreasonable act or omission, nor did it unreasonably refuse to participate in proceedings before the Fair Work Commission; the exceptions under s 570(2)(b) and (c) were not enlivened.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Costs Application Following Dismissal of Originating Application / Post Judgment (determination of Costs)
Outcome
No order as to costs
Legal Topics
['costs' 'statutory Exceptions to Costs Orders' 'jurisdiction of Fair Work Commission' 'operation of S 570 of the Fair Work Act']
['employment and Industrial Relations' 'labour Law'] ['costs' 'statutory Exceptions to Costs Orders' 'jurisdiction of Fair Work Commission' 'operation of S 570 of the Fair Work Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Costs Application Following Dismissal of Originating Application / Post Judgment (determination of Costs)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether applicant engaged in an unreasonable act or omission causing costs under s 570(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)' 'Whether applicant unreasonably refused to participate in proceedings before the Fair Work Commission under s 570(2)(c)']

Ratio Decidendi

No order as to costs because the applicant did not engage in any unreasonable act or omission, nor did it unreasonably refuse to participate in proceedings before the Fair Work Commission; the exceptions under s 570(2)(b) and (c) were not enlivened.

Court Disposition

No order as to costs

Orders

  • ['There be no order as to costs.']