Tartaglia, Re G. Ex Parte T. Del-Pizzo [1986] FCA 352
The court preferred the evidence and signed documentary acknowledgments presented by the creditor over the debtor's explanations, finding that the debtor owed the claimed sum and had committed an act of bankruptcy by failing to comply with the bankruptcy notice.
- Parties
- Debtor: Guiseppe Tartaglia; Creditor: Teresa Del-Pizzo
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Final Determination on Petition and Opposition
- Outcome
- Debtor's notice of opposition dismissed; sequestration order granted against debtor; costs awarded to the petitioning creditor.
- Legal Topics
- Moneys Lent, Sequestration Order, Credibility of Witnesses, Acts of Bankruptcy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guiseppe Tartaglia
Debtor
Teresa Del-Pizzo
Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Final Determination on Petition and Opposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the debtor, Guiseppe Tartaglia, was indebted to the creditor, Teresa Del-Pizzo, in the amount claimed in the bankruptcy petition
- 2 Whether the debtor committed an act of bankruptcy by failing to comply with a bankruptcy notice
Ratio Decidendi
The court preferred the evidence and signed documentary acknowledgments presented by the creditor over the debtor's explanations, finding that the debtor owed the claimed sum and had committed an act of bankruptcy by failing to comply with the bankruptcy notice.
Court Disposition
Debtor's notice of opposition dismissed; sequestration order granted against debtor; costs awarded to the petitioning creditor.
Orders
- Debtor's notice of opposition is dismissed.
- A sequestration order is made with respect to the debtor's estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment