Application of Monier Inc [2009] NSWSC 986
The subpoena did not specify 'particular documents' as required by s 33(6)(b) of the Evidence on Commission Act 1995, instead seeking classes or categories, and could not be remoulded by the Court without fundamentally changing the nature of the foreign court's request. Therefore, the subpoena must be set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Subpoena for Production of Documents Under the Evidence on Commission Act 1995, on Request From a Foreign Court / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Set Aside Subpoena
- Outcome
- Boral's application to set aside the subpoena succeeded.
- Legal Topics
- ['production of Documents' 'letters of Request' 'particularity of Subpoena' 'hague Convention on Evidence' 'oppression in Discovery']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Subpoena for Production of Documents Under the Evidence on Commission Act 1995, on Request From a Foreign Court / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Set Aside Subpoena
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the subpoena issued at the request of a foreign court satisfies the requirement of specifying 'particular documents' under s 33(6)(b) of the Evidence on Commission Act 1995" 'Whether the subpoena amounts to a fishing expedition rather than obtaining evidence for trial' 'Whether the subpoena is oppressive to Boral']
Ratio Decidendi
The subpoena did not specify 'particular documents' as required by s 33(6)(b) of the Evidence on Commission Act 1995, instead seeking classes or categories, and could not be remoulded by the Court without fundamentally changing the nature of the foreign court's request. Therefore, the subpoena must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Boral's application to set aside the subpoena succeeded.
Orders
- ['Orders 1 to 6 made by Kirby J on 24 June 2009 are discharged.' 'The subpoena to produce documents issued to Boral at the request of Monier on 24 June 2009 is set aside.' "Monier is to pay Boral's costs of the notice of motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment