Environment Protection Authority v Morgan Cement International Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 140
Morgan Cement's failure to maintain the Flap Valve in a proper and efficient condition led to emission of slag dust in breach of condition O2.1 of its licence, causing environmental harm within the meaning of the POEOA; the offence was inadvertent, not deliberate or for gain, but practical measures could and should have been used to prevent the harm; the objective seriousness was in the lower to mid-range, with substantial subjective mitigation, justifying a penalty reduced by 33%; and publication and costs orders were also appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence / Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Conviction and monetary penalty imposed; publication and costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['breach of Licence Condition' 'emission of Toxic Slag Dust' 'sentencing' 'environmental Harm' 'objective and Subjective Factors' 'corporate Criminal Liability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Sentence / Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for the breach of condition O2.1 of the environment protection licence under s 64(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 by Morgan Cement International Pty Ltd?' 'What is the objective seriousness of the breach and what are the mitigating subjective factors relevant to sentence?' 'What orders are appropriate under the relevant statutes?']
Ratio Decidendi
Morgan Cement's failure to maintain the Flap Valve in a proper and efficient condition led to emission of slag dust in breach of condition O2.1 of its licence, causing environmental harm within the meaning of the POEOA; the offence was inadvertent, not deliberate or for gain, but practical measures could and should have been used to prevent the harm; the objective seriousness was in the lower to mid-range, with substantial subjective mitigation, justifying a penalty reduced by 33%; and publication and costs orders were also appropriate.
Court Disposition
Conviction and monetary penalty imposed; publication and costs orders made.
Orders
- ['The defendant is convicted as charged.' 'The defendant is fined $50,250.' "The defendant is to pay the prosecutor's legal costs of $55,000." "The defendant is to pay the prosecutor's investigation costs of $492.50." 'The defendant is ordered to publish a notice of the offence and penalty as specified.' 'The...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment