Morris McMahon & Co Pty Limited v SafeWork NSW [2019] NSWCCA 36

Morris McMahon & Co Pty Limited v SafeWork NSW [2019] NSWCCA 36

The Court held there was no error in the sentencing judge’s finding that the offence was of mid-range seriousness, given the deficiencies in the applicant’s safety systems, the foreseeability and actual materialisation of the risk, previous incidents, and the necessity of deterrence. The sentencing judge had adequately accounted for all relevant mitigating considerations, and the fine imposed ($180,000 after discount) was not manifestly excessive when compared to the maximum penalty and the range of comparable sentences for similar offences. Leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Sentence' 'workplace Injury' 'objective Seriousness of Offence' 'mitigating Factors' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']
['criminal Law' 'work Health and Safety Law'] ['appeal Against Sentence' 'workplace Injury' 'objective Seriousness of Offence' 'mitigating Factors' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the offence fell into the mid-range of objective seriousness' 'Whether proper account was taken of mitigating matters' 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held there was no error in the sentencing judge’s finding that the offence was of mid-range seriousness, given the deficiencies in the applicant’s safety systems, the foreseeability and actual materialisation of the risk, previous incidents, and the necessity of deterrence. The sentencing judge had adequately accounted for all relevant mitigating considerations, and the fine imposed ($180,000 after discount) was not manifestly excessive when compared to the maximum penalty and the range of comparable sentences for similar offences. Leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']