Williams v Metropolitan Coal Co Ltd [1948] HCA 8
A statutory bar on re-employment does not extinguish a worker's entitlement to compensation under the Workers' Compensation Act 1926-1946 (N.S.W.) for incapacity resulting from an industrial disease contracted during employment; 'average weekly earnings' is to be calculated based on the employment period with the last employer in the contributing occupation, not the period immediately before incapacity when there may have been no earnings.
- Parties
- Appellant: Morris Williams; Respondent: Metropolitan Coal Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Workers' Compensation Appeal / High Court of Australia on Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Computation of Compensation, Injury Arising From Disease, Statutory Retirement and Compensation Eligibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morris Williams
Appellant
Metropolitan Coal Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Workers' Compensation Appeal / High Court of Australia on Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statutory retirement precludes compensation for post-retirement incapacity arising from a disease contracted prior to retirement
- 2 How 'average weekly earnings' should be computed for a retired worker claiming for disease-related incapacity
- 3 Whether being barred by statute from suitable employment affects eligibility for compensation
Ratio Decidendi
A statutory bar on re-employment does not extinguish a worker's entitlement to compensation under the Workers' Compensation Act 1926-1946 (N.S.W.) for incapacity resulting from an industrial disease contracted during employment; 'average weekly earnings' is to be calculated based on the employment period with the last employer in the contributing occupation, not the period immediately before incapacity when there may have been no earnings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Both submitted questions answered 'No'.
- Respondent to pay appellant's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment