MIA MIA PASTORAL COMPAMY LIMITED V. BOYLE 53/1921

MIA MIA PASTORAL COMPAMY LIMITED V. BOYLE 53/1921

The covenants were not included by mistake; defendant was a surety for R.M. and Ellen Boyle; any extension of time for payment was done with defendant's consent so as not to discharge him as surety; the limit of £15,000 applies only to advances to the principal debtor, and does not include capitalised interest, so further account must be taken of what is due with interest compounded as provided by the instruments and the defendant is liable accordingly.

Parties
Appellant/plaintiff: Mia Mia Pastoral Company Limited; Respondent/defendant: Thomas William Boyle; Mortgagees/transferors: Alfred and Emanuel Abrahams
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 May 1922
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal to High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; orders of Full Court varied and remitted for accounts to be taken consistent with reasons given; defendant to pay costs of appeal.
Legal Topics
Mortgage Liability, Suretyship, Rectification, Mistake in Contract, Limitation of Liability, Capitalisation of Interest
Contract Law Property Law Equity Mortgage Liability Suretyship Rectification Mistake in Contract Limitation of Liability +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mia Mia Pastoral Company Limited

Appellant/plaintiff

Thomas William Boyle

Respondent/defendant

Alfred and Emanuel Abrahams

Mortgagees/transferors

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal to High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether covenants for payment by defendant were included in the mortgages by mistake
  2. 2 Whether defendant was principal debtor or surety under the mortgages
  3. 3 Whether time was given to the principal debtors so as to discharge the surety

Ratio Decidendi

The covenants were not included by mistake; defendant was a surety for R.M. and Ellen Boyle; any extension of time for payment was done with defendant's consent so as not to discharge him as surety; the limit of £15,000 applies only to advances to the principal debtor, and does not include capitalised interest, so further account must be taken of what is due with interest compounded as provided by the instruments and the defendant is liable accordingly.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; orders of Full Court varied and remitted for accounts to be taken consistent with reasons given; defendant to pay costs of appeal.

Orders

  • Account to be taken of amount due by defendant for principal and interest under the securities
  • Declaration that capitalised interest is not to be treated as part of limitation of advances to £15,000