Re Tennant Mortlock v Hawker [1942] HCA 3
On the true construction of the will, the intention disclosed is that fractional or proportional shares of the testator’s children in the residuary estate are to be ascertained on conversion, not at the date of death. Pending ascertainment at conversion, intermediate income should be divided by crediting interest at four percent per annum on each advancement to the fund, dividing the aggregate by the number of beneficiaries, and deducting the credited interest from the share of the advanced beneficiary. Once shares are ascertained, income is to be apportioned in those proportions.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mortlock; Respondents: Hawker and others; Appellants: Hawker and another
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia to the High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Hotchpot Clauses, Ascertainment of Shares, Distribution of Income, Construction of Testamentary Instruments, Advancements to Beneficiaries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mortlock
Appellant
Hawker and others
Respondents
Hawker and another
Appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia to the High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 At what time are the proportionate shares of beneficiaries under a will with a hotchpot clause to be ascertained: at the testator’s death, at conversion, or at some intermediate date?
- 2 How should intermediate income be divided among beneficiaries where advances are to be brought into hotchpot?
Ratio Decidendi
On the true construction of the will, the intention disclosed is that fractional or proportional shares of the testator’s children in the residuary estate are to be ascertained on conversion, not at the date of death. Pending ascertainment at conversion, intermediate income should be divided by crediting interest at four percent per annum on each advancement to the fund, dividing the aggregate by the number of beneficiaries, and deducting the credited interest from the share of the advanced beneficiary. Once shares are ascertained, income is to be apportioned in those proportions.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed.
- Costs of all parties, including trustees on a solicitor and client basis, to be paid out of the estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment