Mumorika, M.J. v. The Queen [1982] FCA 108
In light of the substantial punishment already undergone by the appellant, including traditional punishment and time in custody, the appropriate sentence is effected by suspending the remainder of the custodial sentence, subject to conditions of recognizance and probation, without altering the head sentence or non-parole period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence varied and suspended with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing Principles' 'manslaughter' 'consideration of Traditional Aboriginal Punishment' 'conditional Release']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether sufficient regard was paid to traditional tribal punishment and community wishes' 'Weight to be given to traditional punishment in sentencing' 'Appropriate application of suspended sentence under Criminal Law (Conditional Release of Offenders) Act']
Ratio Decidendi
In light of the substantial punishment already undergone by the appellant, including traditional punishment and time in custody, the appropriate sentence is effected by suspending the remainder of the custodial sentence, subject to conditions of recognizance and probation, without altering the head sentence or non-parole period.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence varied and suspended with conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal be allowed.' 'The sentence appealed from be varied by suspending that sentence as from 1 August 1982 upon the appellant giving security in the sum of $1000, with an appropriate surety in that amount, by recognizance to be of good benaviour for a period of four years and to be subject during that time to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment