Al-Sharifi v Sutherland Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1540
The parties reached an agreement following a conciliation conference as to the appropriate terms of a decision under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, which the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, and the appeal was resolved accordingly without a merits assessment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld by consent; development application approved with conditions; costs order made against the applicant.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the development application should be approved subject to amended plans and conditions of consent' 'Whether agreement between parties pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was appropriate for disposal of proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement following a conciliation conference as to the appropriate terms of a decision under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, which the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, and the appeal was resolved accordingly without a merits assessment.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld by consent; development application approved with conditions; costs order made against the applicant.
Orders
- ["The applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans referred to in condition 1 in the approved conditions at Annexure 'A'." "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to s8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $3,000 within 28 days."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment