Regina v Abdulkader & Hohaia [No 1] [2006] NSWSC 198

Regina v Abdulkader & Hohaia [No 1] [2006] NSWSC 198

Leave to tender Mr Dibb's prior consistent statement was refused because the statement did not assist in determining whether his evidence was a result of reconstruction or suggestion and thus was not important to resolving the credibility issue raised.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Mid Trial Ruling on Application to Tender Evidence
Outcome
Leave to tender statement refused
Legal Topics
['murder' 'alibi' 'prior Consistent Statements' 'credibility' 'leave Under Evidence Act']
['criminal Law' 'evidence Law'] ['murder' 'alibi' 'prior Consistent Statements' 'credibility' 'leave Under Evidence Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Mid Trial Ruling on Application to Tender Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted under s108(3) of the Evidence Act 1995 to tender a prior consistent statement of a witness (Robert Dibb) to counter an implication of suggestion or reconstruction in his evidence' 'Whether the prior consistent statement addresses a credibility attack based on suggestion or reconstruction']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to tender Mr Dibb's prior consistent statement was refused because the statement did not assist in determining whether his evidence was a result of reconstruction or suggestion and thus was not important to resolving the credibility issue raised.

Court Disposition

Leave to tender statement refused

Orders

  • []