Motorola Solutions, Inc. v Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd (Discovery) [2019] FCA 1887
The disputed discovery was refused because the proposed inquiries into the historical origins of Motorola's source code, employment contracts, contractor agreements, and confidential document circumstances were unlikely to yield useful material, would be onerous, expensive, disproportionate, and liable to threaten the trial date; in particular, tracing earlier code would likely only identify earlier copyright works also owned by Motorola and would not facilitate the just, quick, inexpensive and efficient resolution of the proceeding under r 20.11.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property Proceeding; Patents and Associated Statutes; Application for Discovery / Interlocutory Application for Discovery Dated 25 October 2019 Heard and Dismissed on 7 November 2019
- Outcome
- The Respondents' interlocutory application for discovery dated 25 October 2019 was dismissed with costs, with consent orders made for an agreed discovery category.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'copyright Subsistence and Ownership' 'originality of Source Code' 'substantial Part of Copyright Work' 'employment and Contractor Ownership of Copyright' 'aggravated Damages Discovery']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property Proceeding; Patents and Associated Statutes; Application for Discovery / Interlocutory Application for Discovery Dated 25 October 2019 Heard and Dismissed on 7 November 2019
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether discovery should be ordered for documents concerning the coding history of Motorola source code said to be relevant to originality and substantiality.' 'Whether discovery should be ordered of Motorola employment contracts to investigate whether employees retained copyright in code they produced.' 'Whether discovery should be ordered of independent contractor agreements to investigate ownership of copyright in contractor-created code.' 'Whether discovery should be ordered concerning circumstances in which confidentially marked Motorola documents contained open source code, entered the public domain, or were given to third parties including Hytera.']
Ratio Decidendi
The disputed discovery was refused because the proposed inquiries into the historical origins of Motorola's source code, employment contracts, contractor agreements, and confidential document circumstances were unlikely to yield useful material, would be onerous, expensive, disproportionate, and liable to threaten the trial date; in particular, tracing earlier code would likely only identify earlier copyright works also owned by Motorola and would not facilitate the just, quick, inexpensive and efficient resolution of the proceeding under r 20.11.
Court Disposition
The Respondents' interlocutory application for discovery dated 25 October 2019 was dismissed with costs, with consent orders made for an agreed discovery category.
Orders
- ["The Respondents' interlocutory application for discovery dated 25 October 2019 ('Discovery Application') be dismissed." "The Respondents pay the Applicant's costs of the Discovery Application." 'The matter be listed for a case management hearing at 9:30am on 18 November 2019.' 'By 29 November 2019, the Applicant...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment