MOTT v DAVEY [1995] NSWCA 301

MOTT v DAVEY [1995] NSWCA 301

The Court held that the awards for both general damages and future loss of earning capacity were not outside an appropriate range, taking into account the appellant's pre-existing vulnerability to depression, employment history, and the evidence before the trial judge. As such, there was no error warranting appellate intervention.

Parties
Appellant: Mott; Respondent: Davey
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 March 1995
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Damages, Future Economic Loss, General Damages
Torts Personal Injury Damages Future Economic Loss General Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mott

Appellant

Davey

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the quantum of general damages awarded was appellably wrong
  2. 2 Whether the amount allowed for future loss of earning capacity was excessive or insufficient

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the awards for both general damages and future loss of earning capacity were not outside an appropriate range, taking into account the appellant's pre-existing vulnerability to depression, employment history, and the evidence before the trial judge. As such, there was no error warranting appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs