Elddin v Hamed (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1145
A stay of execution of the writ for possession is refused because the defendants, to succeed on appeal, would need to overturn the entirety of the earlier decision on all three raised grounds, which is unlikely. The law correctly distinguishes between equitable interests under a constructive trust and possessory rights against a registered proprietor. Practical and discretionary grounds also weigh against a stay.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Execution / Post Judgment Application Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution refused; costs ordered against the second defendant.
- Legal Topics
- ['possession of Land' 'stay of Execution' 'pending Appeal' 'constructive Trusts' 'equitable Interest']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Execution / Post Judgment Application Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a stay of execution of a writ for possession should be granted pending appeal' 'Whether a purported equitable interest under a constructive trust entitles a defendant to possession as against a registered proprietor']
Ratio Decidendi
A stay of execution of the writ for possession is refused because the defendants, to succeed on appeal, would need to overturn the entirety of the earlier decision on all three raised grounds, which is unlikely. The law correctly distinguishes between equitable interests under a constructive trust and possessory rights against a registered proprietor. Practical and discretionary grounds also weigh against a stay.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution refused; costs ordered against the second defendant.
Orders
- ['The application for stay of the execution of the writ for possession is refused.' 'The second defendant must pay the costs of the plaintiff of the proceedings before me today.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment