Moving Tactics Pty Ltd v IPMG Digital Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 162
Plaintiff established a genuine offsetting claim in respect of legal costs incurred due to defendant's misleading and deceptive conduct, but did not establish a genuine claim for lost revenue. Statutory demand varied to reflect the offsetting claim for legal costs only.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Order to Set Aside or Vary Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Statutory demand varied; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'offsetting Claim' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'legal Costs' 'lost Revenue']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Order to Set Aside or Vary Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether plaintiff has a genuine offsetting claim against statutory demand' 'Whether legal costs and lost revenue claimed by plaintiff are genuine offsetting claims' 'Whether statutory demand should be varied pursuant to s 459H Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff established a genuine offsetting claim in respect of legal costs incurred due to defendant's misleading and deceptive conduct, but did not establish a genuine claim for lost revenue. Statutory demand varied to reflect the offsetting claim for legal costs only.
Court Disposition
Statutory demand varied; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ["The creditor's statutory demand dated 8 October 2010 addressed to the plaintiff is varied by substituting $32,943.57 for $49,218.75." 'No order as to costs; each party to bear its own costs of proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment