MPGA Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council [2021] NSWLEC 1326
The proposed modification, increasing the maximum number of children from 68 to 84 without physical changes to the site or building, constitutes substantially the same development as originally approved, and all jurisdictional and statutory prerequisites for modification are satisfied. The parties’ agreement is an order the Court could properly make.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal (modification Application) / Final Decision After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Application upheld; orders made by consent
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent Modification' 'child Care Centre' 'conciliation Conference']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal (modification Application) / Final Decision After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed modification results in a development that is substantially the same as originally approved under s 4.55(2) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites under s 4.55(2) EPA Act and relevant State Environmental Planning Policies are satisfied for modifying the consent for a child care centre']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed modification, increasing the maximum number of children from 68 to 84 without physical changes to the site or building, constitutes substantially the same development as originally approved, and all jurisdictional and statutory prerequisites for modification are satisfied. The parties’ agreement is an order the Court could properly make.
Court Disposition
Application upheld; orders made by consent
Orders
- ['Applicant granted leave to rely on specified amended plans and documents.' 'Appeal upheld.' 'Modification of Development Consent No. 352.1/2018 approved: maximum number of children increased from 68 to 84.' "Development Consent No. 352.1/2018 modified as set out in Annexure 'A'." "Development Consent No....
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment